Abstract

The modified electrostatic model (Neumann and Tolle 1995) is applied to the impurity diffusion in nickel. Z o = 0.4 is used for the effective charge of the nickel ion. The comparison of calculated and experimental diffusion parameters reveals that the sign of ΔQ, the difference between impurity diffusion and self-diffusion energy, and the sign of the difference between impurity diffusion and self-diffusion coefficient is correctly predicted in all cases. On the other hand the comparison exhibits some systematic deviations for 5p impurities, which cannot be explained in terms of the current impurity diffusion models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.