Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, surface roughness prediction models are developed for turning of Inconel 718 using untreated and cryogenically treated inserts by using Dimensional Analysis, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Performance of untreated and treated tools is analysed using SEM, Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Vicker hardness test and electrical conductivity. For the established surface roughness models by dimensional analysis, RSM and ANN, the mean absolute errors for confirmation tests are 5.32%, 8.28% and 4.15% for untreated inserts and 4.95%, 6.01% and 4.20% for treated inserts, respectively. The effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness is analysed using the main effect plot and 3D surface plots. Based on correlation coefficient (R2 ) values, ANN modelling technique (R2 = 99.68%) is more accurate for predicting surface roughness. Thus, it can be an effective tool for analysing machining responses. The study also noted that while cutting at v= 60 m/min, f= 0.1 mm/rev and d= 0.5 mm, surface roughness and flank wear values are 0.5 µm and 0.45 µm and 0.777 mm and 0.627 mm for untreated and treated inserts, respectively. The use of treated tools resulted in 10% and 19% improvement in surface quality and tool life than the untreated tools.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.