Abstract

Globally, areas of high-quality wildlife habitat of significant environmental value are at risk of permanent damage from climate change. These areas represent social-ecological systems that will require increasing management intervention to maintain their biological and socio-cultural values. Managers of protected areas have begun to recognize the inevitability of ecosystem change and the need to embrace dynamic approaches to intervention. However, significant uncertainty remains about the onset and severity of some impacts, which makes planning difficult. For Indigenous communities, there are intrinsic links between cultural heritage and the conservation of place and biodiversity that need to be better integrated in protected area planning and management. In New South Wales, Australia, management of public conservation reserves and national parks is the responsibility of a State government agency, the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS). This paper describes the outcomes of a participatory planning process with NPWS staff to, firstly, identify the options available, the available ‘tool kit’, to manage biodiversity and cultural heritage in protected areas; secondly, explore how the selection of management actions from the ‘tool kit’ is associated with the level of climate risk to biodiversity or cultural heritage assets; and thirdly, to understand how the form of individual management actions might adapt to changes in climate risk. Combining these three elements into a series of risk-based, adaptive pathways for conservation of biodiversity and cultural heritage is a novel approach that is currently supporting place-based planning for public conservation areas. Incorporation of the trade-offs and synergies in seeking to effectively manage these discrete but related types of values and the implications for conservation practice are discussed.

Highlights

  • Conceptualization of coupled human and natural systems as social-ecological systems enables the study of the interaction of society and the natural environment

  • The suite of management actions to respond to changes in the climate, Figure 3 depicts adaptive pathways constructed from the range of actions available to manage effectively the adaptation ‘tool kit’ for biodiversity conservation, is listed on the left-hand side of biodiversity in a protected area

  • Five pathways are implemented at negligible risk: pathways have clear starting points that relate to the need for progressive implementation of selected monitoring of vulnerable or endangered species, communication, management actions as risk levels increase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conceptualization of coupled human and natural systems as social-ecological systems enables the study of the interaction of society and the natural environment Such studies emphasize the unique emergent properties of social-ecological systems as nonlinear dynamics with thresholds, reciprocal feedback loops, time lags, resilience, heterogeneity, and surprises that vary considerably across scale and in scope [1]. Protected areas, such as nature reserves and national parks, are recognized as social-ecological systems because they are natural areas managed for specific ecosystem service outcomes valued by society [2]. Despite the significant area under protection, the biodiversity and cultural heritage values in protected areas are considered increasingly vulnerable to changes in climate [7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call