Application of radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) stands as the third most prevalent cancer globally, projecting 3.2 million new cases and 1.6 million deaths by 2040. Accurate lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection is critical for determining optimal surgical approaches, including preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery, which significantly influence CRC prognosis. However, conventional imaging lacks adequate precision, prompting exploration into radiomics, which addresses this shortfall by converting medical images into reproducible, quantitative data. Methods: Following PRISMA, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C77, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C78 and AMSTAR-2 guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C79, we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases until January 11, 2024, to evaluate radiomics models’ diagnostic precision in predicting preoperative LNM in CRC patients. The quality and bias risk of the included studies were assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Subsequently, statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Thirty-six studies encompassing 8,039 patients were included, with a significant concentration in 2022-2023 (20/36). Radiomics models predicting LNM demonstrated a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), featuring sensitivity and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.78), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed similar AUCs for CT and MRI-based models, and rectal cancer models outperformed colon and colorectal cancers. Additionally, studies utilizing cross-validation, 2D segmentation, internal validation, manual segmentation, prospective design, and single-center populations tended to have higher AUCs. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Radiologists collectively achieved a pooled AUC of 0.659 (95% CI: 0.627, 0.691), significantly differing from the performance of radiomics models (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Artificial intelligence-based radiomics shows promise in preoperative lymph node staging for CRC, exhibiting significant predictive performance. These findings support the integration of radiomics into clinical practice to enhance preoperative strategies in CRC management.