Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of the Projected Unit Credit (PUC) Method and the Entry Age Normal (EAN) Method in the context of pension fund insurance. The Projected Unit Credit Method and the Entry Age Normal Method are two actuarial approaches used to calculate liabilities and determine the required contributions in pension plans. The Projected Unit Credit Method calculates based on projected future salaries and benefits accumulated over the employee's working life, while the Entry Age Normal Method distributes the cost of retirement benefits evenly over the employee's working life. Data was collected from various pension plans that use both methods. Analysis was conducted to compare the accuracy of liability estimation, contribution stability, and the impact of each method on pension fund sustainability. The results show that the Projected Unit Credit Method provides a more realistic liability estimate by considering salary increases, while the Entry Age Normal Method offers better contribution stability from year to year. The selection of the appropriate actuarial method is highly dependent on the objectives and specific conditions of the pension program being managed. These findings are expected to help pension fund managers make more informed decisions to ensure the welfare of pension plan participants.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
