Abstract
This study employs a normative legal research method, grounded in the Nonet and Selznick theory of responsive law, to examine the implementation of capital punishment for narcotics offenders in Indonesia. Evaluating the punitive measures through the lens of responsiveness to societal goals, participation of vulnerable groups, and legal institutions' balanced response, the research highlights the need for a nuanced approach. Findings indicate that the current use of capital punishment lacks effectiveness and contradicts human rights principles. The study suggests a reassessment, prioritizing rehabilitation and decriminalization for a more humane and sustainable approach to combating narcotics trafficking.
 Highlights: 
 
 The study reevaluates the application of capital punishment for narcotics crimes in Indonesia through the lens of responsive legal principles.
 Findings underscore the ineffectiveness of the current punitive measures and their conflict with human rights norms.
 The research advocates for a reconsideration of the approach, emphasizing rehabilitation and decriminalization to achieve a more humane and sustainable strategy against narcotics trafficking.
 
 Keywords: Capital Punishment, Narcotics Offenses, Responsive Law, Human Rights, Rehabilitation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
