Abstract
AbstractMetal forming processes are usually accompanied by large plastic strains and rotations of the material elements which emphasizes the need for reliable finite strain elastoplasticity models in corresponding FE simulations. In this work, two specific finite strain hyper‐ and hypoelastic‐based plasticity models with combined nonlinear isotropic and kinematic hardening are presented and compared in numerical FE simulations. Although both models led to remarkably different results in a shear‐dominated single element deformation test, the structural simulation of a standard deep drawing process delivered nearly congruent results which suggests that both models are equally well‐suited for modeling metals in common forming processes. (© 2013 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
