Abstract

The aftermath of the Indian Ocean tsunami on 26 December 2004 triggered by the off Sumatra earthquake (magnitude “M” = 9.1), and the Great East Japan earthquake of 11 March 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku (M = 9.0), evidence the secondary damage from driftage collision due to large tsunami waves. To prevent this type of damage, the establishment of methods for predicting driftage movement and calculating the impact force by driftage is necessary. Several numerical models have been developed to predict the driftage movement of objects. Every year, these improve in accuracy and usability. In contrast, there are many calculation formulae for calculating the impact force. However, since there are considerable differences between values calculated using these formulae, the reliability of each formula is unknown. Therefore, in this research, one team of the committee on tsunami research of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers summarizes the main calculation formulae of impact forces that have been proposed until 2019. In addition, for each type of driftage (driftwood, containers, cars, ships), we compare calculation values of these formulae with measured data of large-scale experiments. Finally, we check the range of calculation values for each formula up to 15 m/s in collision velocity and clarify then the following facts: (1) In the case of driftwood, the formulae of Matsutomi, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) are most reliable; (2) In the case of containers, the formulae of Matsutomi, Arikawa et al., FEMA and NOAA, Ikeno et al., and ASCE are most reliable; (3) In the case of cars, the formulae of FEMA and NOAA, and ASCE are most reliable; (4) In the case of ships, the formulae of Mizutani, FEMA and NOAA, and ASCE are most reliable.

Highlights

  • We summarize the main calculation formulae of impact forces proposed by 2019, and the calculation values by these formulae are compared with measured data of large-scale experiments for each type of driftage

  • We used the stiffness recommended by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [11] and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) [13] in the case of a 6.1 m container and a 12.2 m container, and the recommended stiffness of Takabatake et al [24] or Kaida and Kihara [6] for cars and ships

  • We summarized the main calculation formulae of the impact force proposed by 2019 and compared the calculation values of these formulae with the measured data from large-scale experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lak in Thailand, (c) a large fishing boat left behind in the ruins near a fishing port at Kesennuma in in Japan, and (d) a broken steel frame building that was located on the shortest line between the. Kaida and Kihara [6] investigated calculation formulae of impact forces proposed until 2012, and they checked the performance range of calculated values by each formula up to a maximum value of collision velocity of 10 m/s They summarized the calculation formulae that are effective for each type of driftage. Ad and Ld are the sectional area and the length of driftage

C u km
List of Main Calculation Formulae
Correlation Examination of the Main Calculation Formulae
Driftwood
Comparison
Range of Impact Force of Each Formula
10. Impact
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call