Abstract

A major global health concern with a high recurrence rate is urolithiasis. Various in vivo and in vitro techniques have been effective in assessing the anti urolithiatic capacity of therapeutic plants. Renal stone production can be studied using in vitro models, whereas the pathological implications of urolithiasis are declared using in vivo models. Therefore, preventative management can be considerably and successfully evaluated using in vitro models, whereas urolithiasis treatment can be directed by using in vivo models. This study explains the benefits, drawbacks, and uses of both models, with a focus on the contribution of in vitro research to the assessment of preventive care. We done Physicochemical Tests for Phyllanthus acidus (fruits) Tinospora cordifolia (leaves) and Psidium gujava (fruits and leaves ) and also Preliminary Phytochemical Investigation of Phyllanthus acidus (fruits), Tinospora cordifolia (leaves) and Psidium gujava (fruits and leaves).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call