Abstract

BackgroundHuman regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the fundamental component of the immune system imposing immune tolerance via control of effector T cells (Teffs). Ongoing attempts to improve Tregs function have led to the creation of a protocol that produces antigen-specific Tregs, when polyclonal Tregs are stimulated with monocytes loaded with antigens specific for type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the suppression exerted by the produced Tregs depended on the antigen with the best results when insulin β chain peptide 9-23 was used. Here, we examined epigenetic modifications, which could influence these functional differences.MethodsThe analysis was pefromed in the sorted specific (SPEC, proliferating) and unspecific (UNSPEC, non-proliferating) subsets of Tregs and Teffs generated by the stimulation with monocytes loaded with either whole insulin (INS) or insulin β chain peptide 9-23 (B:9-23) or polyclonal cells stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads (POLY). A relative expression of crucial Tregs genes was determined by qRT-PCR. The Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) in FoxP3 gene methylation levels were assessed by Quantitative Methylation Specific PCR (qMSP). ELISA was used to measure genomic DNA methylation and histone H3 post-translational modifications (PTMs).ResultsTregs SPECB:9-23 was the only subset expressing all assessed genes necessary for regulatory function with the highest level of expression among all analyzed conditions. The methylation of global DNA as well as TSDR were significantly lower in Tregs SPECB:9-23 than in Tregs SPECINS. When compared to Teffs, Tregs were characterized by a relatively lower level of PTMs but it varied in respective Tregs/Teffs pairs. Importantly, whenever the difference in PTM within Tregs/Teffs pair was significant, it was always low in one subset from the pair and high in the other. It was always low in Tregs SPECINS and high in Teffs SPECINS, while it was high in Tregs UNSPECINS and low in Teffs UNSPECINS. There were no differences in Tregs/Teffs SPECB:9-23 pair and the level of modifications was low in Tregs UNSPECB:9-23 and high in Teffs UNSPECB:9-23. The regions of PTMs in which differences were significant overlapped only partially between particular Tregs/Teffs pairs.ConclusionsWhole insulin and insulin β chain peptide 9-23 affected epigenetic changes in CD4+ T cells differently, when presented by monocytes. The peptide preferably favored specific Tregs, while whole insulin activated both Tregs and Teffs.

Highlights

  • T regulatory cells (Tregs) constitute a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes which is pivotal in immune tolerance due to their ability to suppress effector cells

  • Taking into account already known TSDRmediated regulation of FoxP3 gene, we assumed that other epigenetic changes could be very important in the activity of the manufactured cells and we investigated global genomic DNA methylation, methylation in specific Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) region of FoxP3 gene and histone H3 post-translational modifications (PTMs)

  • We compared polyclonal Tregs, which are a cellular medicinal product used in the treatment of type 1 diabetes, with Tregs specific and unspecific against whole insulin or insulin b chain peptide 9-23

Read more

Summary

Introduction

T regulatory cells (Tregs) constitute a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes which is pivotal in immune tolerance due to their ability to suppress effector cells. Natural T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25highCD127-FoxP3+; Tregs) are mainly predisposed to exert suppressive functions over effectors, which is highlighted by stable genomic architecture in this subset of Tregs. The sustained expression of FoxP3, possible due to demethylated TSDR, allows the expression of a wide range of other genes encoding such as: Eos, GITR, CTLA4, and simultaneously suppresses activation of: IL-2, IL-4 and INF-g [1,2,3,4]. Other important function-associated genes in Tregs are: IL2RA (CD25), CTLA4 (CD152), TNFRSF18 (GITR), IKZF2 (Helios), IKZF4 (Eos) and Tet2 [5,6,7,8]. We examined epigenetic modifications, which could influence these functional differences

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call