Antigenemia, immunoblotting, and enzyme immunoassay for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant patients

Abstract

Abstract Timely and rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is important for the management of transplant patients. We compared three serological assays, IgM immunoblot and IgG/IgM enzyme immunoassay (EIA), as well as the detection of CMV antigens in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes (antigenemia), for their value in the early diagnosis of CMV infection. Thirty-one patients were monitored longitudinally for 3 months after renal transplantation. Laboratory documented CMV infection occurred in 20 patients. All of these cases showed a positive IgM immunoblot result that was confirmed by at least one of the other test assays (IgG EIA 19/20, antigenemia assay 13/20, and IgM EIA 12/20). All of the ten patients whose clinical picture was compatible with symptomatic CMV disease were positive for CMV infection according to IgM immunoblot and IgG EIA, nine were positive according to the antigenemia assay, and seven were positive according to IgM EIA. With reference to the temporal pattern, the antigenemia assay indicated CMV infection significantly earlier than the serological tests (P≪ 0.05). In symptomatic patients CMV antigen-positive leukocytes were, on the average, detected on the day of onset of symptoms, whereas detection by IgM immunoblot, IgG EIA, and IgM EIA followed 8, 13, and 14 days later, respectively. These results show that: (1) the CMV antigenemia assay is very useful for the early diagnosis of symptomatic CMV infections; (2) CMV antibodies, as an indicator of CMV infection, are detectable earlier and more frequently by IgM immunoblot than by IgG/IgM EIA; (3) compared to CMV antigenemia, the IgM immunoblot indicated CMV infection more often but significantly later; and (4) only a combination of several diagnostic methods allows optimal detection of CMV infections in renal transplant patients.