Abstract

In several developing countries, studies on antimicrobial resistance among bacteria from food animals are rare mostly because of under-resourced laboratories. The objective of this study was to develop and field-test a low cost protocol to estimate the isolate- and sample-level prevalence of resistance to critically important antibiotics among Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from dairy cattle feces. Using a predesigned protocol, fecal samples were collected to isolate non-type-specific E. coli and Salmonella using selective media without antibiotic supplements. Besides, samples were screened for E. coli and Salmonella isolates not susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins and quinolones using selective media supplemented with cefotaxime (1.0 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacine (0.5 μg/mL), respectively. All bacterial isolates were further tested for antibiotic susceptibility using disk diffusion. Bacterial isolates not susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins were tested for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype using the combination disk test. Molecular methods were performed on selected bacterial isolates to identify and distinguish genetic determinants associated with the observed phenotypes. Among 85 non-type-specific E. coli isolated from MacConkey agar without antibiotics, the isolate-level prevalence of resistance to tetracycline was the highest (8.2%). Among 37 E. coli recovered from MacConkey agar with cefotaxime, 56.8% were resistant ceftriaxone. Among 22 E. coli isolates recovered from MacConkey agar with ciprofloxacin, 77.3% and 54.5% were resistant to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Sixteen Salmonella were isolated and only one demonstrated any resistance (i.e., single resistance to streptomycin). Among E. coli isolates not susceptible to ceftriaxone, an AmpC phenotype was more common than an ESBL phenotype (29 versus 10 isolates, respectively). Whole genome sequencing showed that phenotypic profiles of antibiotic resistance detected were generally substantiated by genotypic profiles. The tested protocol is suited to detecting and estimating prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from food animal feces in resource-limited laboratories in the developing world.

Highlights

  • Monitoring of the emergence, spread, and changes in levels of antimicrobial resistant bacteria along the food chain is needed to inform and guide integrated strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance [1]

  • Antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolated bacteria showed that resistance to antibiotics was rare among NTS E. coli isolated on MAC when compared to presumptive 3GCr E. coli screened on MAC+cefotaxime 30μg (CTX) or else presumptive Qr E. coli screened on MAC supplemented with 0.5μg/mL of ciprofloxacin (MAC+ciprofloxacin 5μg (CIP))

  • Isolate-level prevalence of resistance to tetracycline (8.2%) was the highest among NTS E. coli isolates while resistance to cefoxitin, colistin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin were completely absent among these bacterial isolates (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring of the emergence, spread, and changes in levels of antimicrobial resistant bacteria along the food chain is needed to inform and guide integrated strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance [1]. Surveillance systems of antibiotic resistant bacteria in food animals target pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella and Campylobacter as well as indicator bacteria, such as E. coli and Enterococcus spp. After their isolation from samples, genus/ species confirmation, and subtyping when necessary, the bacteria of interest are tested for susceptibility to a select number of antibiotics using a standard phenotyping method of choice. After phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing, genetic characterization can be done through the detection of targeted genes or through whole genome sequencing (WGS). The selective culture and detection of bacteria with rare antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mechanisms is highly recommended [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call