Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prescribing Practice in Head and Neck Tumor Resection and Free Flap Reconstruction.

Abstract

BackgroundAdherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis is often poor and is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Prescribing audits that suggested poor adherence to guidelines in a plastic surgery department led to a targeted education program to bring antibiotic prescriptions in line with hospital guidelines. We reviewed whether this intervention was associated with changed perioperative prescribing and altered surgical outcomes, including the rate of surgical site infections, specifically looking at clean-contaminated head and neck tumor resections with free flap reconstruction.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on 325 patients who underwent clean-contaminated head and neck tumor resection and free flap reconstruction from January 1, 2013, to February 19, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those before (pre-intervention) and after (postintervention) the education campaign. We analyzed patient demographic and disease characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative factors, and surgical outcomes.ResultsPatients pre-intervention were prescribed longer courses of prophylactic antibiotics (median [interquartile range], 9 [8] vs 1 [1]; P < .001), more topical chloramphenicol ointment (21.82% vs 0%; P < .001), and more oral nystatin (36.9% vs 12.2%; P < .001). Patients postintervention had higher rates of recipient infections (36.11% vs 17.06%; P < .001) and donor site infections (6.94% vs 1.19%; P = .006).ConclusionsFollowing the education campaign, patients were prescribed shorter courses of prophylactic antibiotics, more of the recommended cefazolin-metronidazole regimen, and fewer topical antibiotics. However, patients also had a higher rate of surgical site infections.