Abstract
Many high-tech companies adopt anti-takeover provisions (ATPs). This has been especially prevalent in the software industry. These companies argue that takeover protection is necessary to protect the company from ‘opportunistic’ takeover bids; and thus, to enable the company to focus on long-term innovation and value-creation. This has induced some regulators, such as the Ontario Securities Commission, to re-evaluate their restrictions on ATPs. Thus, I test if ATPs can encourage value-creating innovation in companies in the software industry (‘IT companies’, for short). I analyze the impact of ATPs on investments (acquisitions) made by IT companies. I find that Protected-IT companies, as marked by a preponderance of ATPs, make acquisitions that create more shareholder wealth (as proxied by acquirer returns and post-acquisition Tobin’s Qs) and are more likely to undertake acquisitions that increase innovation (as proxied by increases in R&D). This suggests that ATPs might be beneficial in high-tech companies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
