Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Wealth Effects of Litigation by Targets: Do Interests Diverge in a Merge?Gregg A. JarrellGregg A. Jarrell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 28, Number 1Apr., 1985 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467078 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 71Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Chune Young Chung, Incheol Kim, Monika K. Rabarison, Thomas Y. To, Eliza Wu Shareholder litigation rights and corporate acquisitions, Journal of Corporate Finance 62 (Jun 2020): 101599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101599Jie (Michael) Guo, Lu Li, Nan Hu, Xing Wang Do managers keep their word? The disclosure of merger intention at pre-merger issuance and M&A performance, Finance Research Letters 28 (Mar 2019): 20–31.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.03.007 , ( 2018): 203.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119544159.biblioTingting Liu, J. Harold Mulherin, William O. Brown The Development of the Takeover Auction Process: The Evolution of Property Rights in the Modern Wild West, SSRN Electronic Journal 98 (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3112724Ettore Croci, Eric Nowak, Olaf Ehrhardt The corporate governance endgame – minority squeeze-out regulation and post-deal litigation in Germany, Managerial Finance 43, no.11 (Jan 2017): 95–123.https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2016-0032Guillem Ordddez Calaff, John E. Thanassoulis Takeover Resistance: A Global Games Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2792210Chune Young Chung, Incheol Kim, Monika K. Rabarison Is Shareholder Litigation an Effective External Monitoring Device? Evidence from M&As, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3086313Michel Albouy, Mohamed Thraya Fusions-acquisitions et bénéfices privés : le cas Wendel, Management & Avenir N° 81, no.77 (Dec 2015): 101–121.https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.081.0101C. N. V. Krishnan, Ronald W. Masulis, Randall S. Thomas, Robert B. Thompson Jurisdictional Effects in M&A Litigation, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11, no.11 (Jan 2014): 132–158.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12037Stefan Eichler, Dominik Maltritz An options-based approach to forecast competing bids: evidence for Canadian takeover battles, Applied Economics 45, no.3434 (Dec 2013): 4805–4819.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.804167C.N.V. Krishnan, Ronald W. Masulis, Randall S. Thomas, Robert B. Thompson Shareholder litigation in mergers and acquisitions, Journal of Corporate Finance 18, no.55 (Dec 2012): 1248–1268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.08.004C. N. V. Krishnan, Ronald W. Masulis, Randall S. Thomas, Robert B. Thompson Litigation in Mergers and Acquisitions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1722227Ettore Croci, Olaf Ehrhardt, Eric Nowak The Corporate Governance Endgame – An Economic Analysis of Minority Squeeze-Out Regulation in Germany, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2080745Michael Ryngaert, Ralph Scholten Have changing takeover defense rules and strategies entrenched management and damaged shareholders? The case of defeated takeover bids, Journal of Corporate Finance 16, no.11 (Feb 2010): 16–37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.09.002 References, (Jan 2010): 687–714.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374878-2.00074-XRichard Schoenberg, Daniel Thornton The Impact of Bid Defences in Hostile Acquisitions, European Management Journal 24, no.2-32-3 (Apr 2006): 142–150.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2006.03.004Tomas Jandik, Anil K. Makhija Debt, debt structure and corporate performance after unsuccessful takeovers: evidence from targets that remain independent, Journal of Corporate Finance 11, no.55 (Oct 2005): 882–914.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.04.002John A. Pearce, Richard B. Robinson Hostile takeover defenses that maximize shareholder wealth, Business Horizons 47, no.55 (Sep 2004): 15–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.07.004Tomas Jandik, Anil K. Makhija Debt, Debt Structure and Corporate Performance after Unsuccessful Takeovers: Evidence from Targets that Remain Independent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.679031Michael C. Jensen Takeovers: Folklore and Science, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.350425Craig E. Lefanowicz, John R. Robinson Multiple Bids, Management Opposition, and the Market for Corporate Control, The Financial Review 35, no.44 (Nov 2000): 109–122.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2000.tb01432.xPeter O. Mülbert, Max Birke In Defense of Passivity — on the Proper Role of a Target’s Management in Response to a Hostile Tender Offer, European Business Organization Law Review 1, no.33 (Feb 2015): 445–478.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752900000227Richard R. Vecchiolla, Melanie Prudom, Robert D. Hamilton Exposing the Corporate Vampires: a Shareholders Guide to Management Entrenchment, Long Range Planning 31, no.55 (Oct 1998): 659–671.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00071-5Gregory M. Noronha, Nilanjan Sen, David M. Smith Determinants of bidder competition in corporate takeovers, Journal of Economics and Finance 20, no.33 (Sep 1996): 39–47.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920605L. Mick Swartz The 1990 Pennsylvania Antitakeover Law: Should Firms Opt Out of Antitakeover Legislation?, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11, no.22 (Apr 1996): 223–246.https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9601100205Sarah W. Peck The influence of professional investors on the failure of management buyout attempts, Journal of Financial Economics 40, no.22 (Feb 1996): 267–294.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00847-8Satish Thosar Tender Offers and Target Management Responses: Managerial Entrenchment Versus Stockholder Interest Revisited, The Financial Review 31, no.11 (Feb 1996): 87–104.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1996.tb00865.xSanjiv Jaggia, Satish Thosar Contested Tender Offers: An Estimate of the Hazard Function, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13, no.11 (Jan 1995): 113–119.https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524584Rakesh Duggal, James A. Millar Institutional investors, antitakeover defenses and success of hostile takeover bids, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34, no.44 (Dec 1994): 387–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/1062-9769(94)90022-1SUSAN CHAPLINSKY, GREG NIEHAUS The Role of ESOPs in Takeover Contests, The Journal of Finance 49, no.44 (Apr 2012): 1451–1470.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02461.xJames A. Brickley, Jeffrey L. Coles, Rory L. Terry Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills, Journal of Financial Economics 35, no.33 (Jun 1994): 371–390.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90038-8Ann K. Buchholtz, Barbara A. Ribbens Role of Chief Executive Officers in Takeover Resistance: Effects of CEO Incentives and Individual Characteristics, Academy of Management Journal 37, no.33 (Jun 1994): 554–579.https://doi.org/10.5465/256700Sanjai Bhagat, James A. Brickley, Jeffrey L. Coles The costs of inefficient bargaining and financial distress, Journal of Financial Economics 35, no.22 (Apr 1994): 221–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90005-1David Hirshleifer, Anjan V. Thakor Managerial performance, boards of directors and takeover bidding, Journal of Corporate Finance 1, no.11 (Mar 1994): 63–90.https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-1199(94)90010-8Geoffrey Poitras Shareholder wealth maximization, business ethics and social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics 13, no.22 (Feb 1994): 125–134.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881581Rita D. Kosnik, Thomas A. Turk The Antecedents and Consequences of Resistance to Take-overs, (Jan 1994): 170–190.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13016-0_8James P. Walsh, James K. Seward On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms, (Jan 1994): 191–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13016-0_9Sanjiv Jaggia, Satish Thosar Multiple bids as a consequence of target management resistance: A count data approach, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 3, no.44 (Dec 1993): 447–457.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409622Rakesh Duggal, Mike Cudd Successful antitakeover defenses, top management turnover and stock prices, Managerial and Decision Economics 14, no.66 (Nov 1993): 509–517.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090140604Robert H. Jennings, Michael A. Mazzeo Competing Bids, Target Management Resistance, and the Structure of Takeover Bids, Review of Financial Studies 6, no.44 (Oct 1993): 883–909.https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.4.883ABAGAIL MCWILLIAMS, THOMAS A. TURK, ASGHAR ZARDKOOHI ANTITRUST POLICY AND MERGERS: THE WEALTH EFFECT OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, Economic Inquiry 31, no.44 (Oct 1993): 517–533.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00888.xPeter A. Brous, Omesh Kini A reexamination of analysts' earnings forecasts for takeover targets, Journal of Financial Economics 33, no.22 (Apr 1993): 201–225.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90004-UFred S. McChesney Transaction costs and corporate greenmail: Theory, empirics and a mickey mouse case study, Managerial and Decision Economics 14, no.22 (Mar 1993): 131–150.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090140206Roberta Romano RETHINKING TAKEOVER REGULATION, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5, no.33 (Sep 1992): 47–57.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1992.tb00225.xThomas A. Turk Takeover Resistance, Information Leakage, and Target Firm Value, Journal of Management 18, no.33 (Jun 2016): 503–522.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800305Richard P. Castanias, Constance E. Helfat Managerial and windfall rents in the market for corporate control, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18, no.22 (Jul 1992): 153–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90025-7Deepak K. Datta, George E. Pinches, V. K. Narayanan Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta-analysis, Strategic Management Journal 13, no.11 (Jan 1992): 67–84.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130106William P. Forbes Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: Some UK Evidence, Managerial Finance 17, no.66 (Jun 1991): 24–34.https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013688Lisa Borstadt, Thomas Zwirlein, James Brickley Defending Against Hostile Takeovers: Impact on Shareholder Wealth, Managerial Finance 17, no.11 (Jan 1991): 25–33.https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013664DAVID J. DENIS Defensive Changes in Corporate Payout Policy: Share Repurchases and Special Dividends, The Journal of Finance 45, no.55 (Apr 2012): 1433–1456.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03722.x Malcolm B. Coate , Richard S. Higgins , and Fred S. Mc Chesney Bureaucracy and Politics in FTC Merger Challenges, The Journal of Law and Economics 33, no.22 (Oct 2015): 463–482.https://doi.org/10.1086/467214Lilli A. Gordon, John Pound ESOPs and corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics 27, no.22 (Oct 1990): 525–555.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90066-9James P. Walsh, James K. Seward On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms, Academy of Management Review 15, no.33 (Jul 1990): 421–458.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308826 David Hirshleifer , and Sheridan Titman Share Tendering Strategies and the Success of Hostile Takeover Bids, Journal of Political Economy 98, no.22 (Oct 2015): 295–324.https://doi.org/10.1086/261679ELAZAR BERKOVITCH, NAVEEN KHANNA How Target Shareholders Benefit from Value-Reducing Defensive Strategies in Takeovers, The Journal of Finance 45, no.11 (Apr 2012): 137–156.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05084.xPeter H. Eddey, Roger S. Casey Directors' Recommendations in Response to Takeover Bids: Do They Act in Their Own Interests?, Australian Journal of Management 14, no.11 (Jun 1989): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1177/031289628901400101B.Espen Eckbo, Herwig Langohr Information disclosure, method of payment, and takeover premiums, Journal of Financial Economics 24, no.22 (Jan 1989): 363–403.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90052-4John Pound The information effects of takeover bids and resistance, Journal of Financial Economics 22, no.22 (Dec 1988): 207–227.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90069-4Leon Levitt A business version of the prisoner’s dilemma: A teaching technique, International Journal of Value-Based Management 1, no.22 (Jun 1988): 83–90.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184884Gregg A Jarrell, James A Brickley, Jeffry M Netter The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no.11 (Feb 1988): 49–68.https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.1.49 Alan Schwartz The Fairness of Tender Offer Prices in Utilitarian Theory, The Journal of Legal Studies 17, no.11 (Oct 2015): 165–196.https://doi.org/10.1086/468126Michael C. Jensen, Jerold B. Warner The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders, and directors, Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Jan 1988): 3–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90038-4Gregg A. Jarrell, Annette B. Poulsen Dual-class recapitalizations as antitakeover mechanisms, Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Jan 1988): 129–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90042-6Michael Ryngaert The effect of poison pill securities on shareholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Jan 1988): 377–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90051-7Sreenivas Kamma, Joseph Weintrop, Peggy Wier Investors' perceptions of the Delaware Supreme Court decision in Unocal v. Mesa, Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Jan 1988): 419–430.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90052-9Larry Y. Dann, Harry DeAngelo Corporate financial policy and corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Jan 1988): 87–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90041-4Gregg A. Jarrell, Annette B. Poulsen Shark repellents and stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics 19, no.11 (Sep 1987): 127–168.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90032-8SANJAI BHAGAT, JAMES A. BRICKLEY, URI LOEWENSTEIN The Pricing Effects of Interfirm Cash Tender Offers, The Journal of Finance 42, no.44 (Apr 2012): 965–986.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03922.xANNETTE B. POULSEN, GREGG A. JARRELL MOTIVATIONS FOR HOSTILE TENDER OFFERS AND THE MARKET FOR POLITICAL EXCHANGE, Contemporary Economic Policy 4, no.33 (Jul 1986): 30–45.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1986.tb00847.xSudi Sudarsanam Corporate governance, corporate control and takeovers, (): 119–155.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(00)01006-1Jeffrey S. Harrison, Hugh M. O'Neill, Robert E. Hoskisson Acquisition strategy and target resistance: A theory of countervailing effects of pre-merger bidding and post merger integration, (): 157–182.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(00)01007-3

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call