Anti–IL-4R versus anti–IL-5/5R after anti–IL-5/5R failure in asthma: An emulated target trial

Abstract

BackgroundSwitching biologics is now common practice in severe eosinophilic asthma. After insufficient response to anti-interleukin 5 or 5 receptor (anti-IL-5/5R), the optimal switch between an anti-IL-4R monoclonal antibody (mAb) (inter-class) or another anti-IL-5/5R drug (intra-class) remains unknown. ObjectiveWe compared the effectiveness of these two strategies on asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. MethodsWe emulated a target randomized trial using observational data from the RAMSES Cohort. Eligible patients were switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb or another anti-IL-5/5R drug after insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score at 6 months. ResultsAmong the 2046 patients in the cohort, 151 were included in the study: 103 switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb and 48 to another anti-IL-5/5R. At 6 months, the difference in ACT score improvement was not statistically significant (mean difference groups, 0.82 [-0.47,2.10], p=0.213). The inter-class group exhibited greater cumulative reduction in oral corticosteroids dose (Pinter-intra -1.05g [-1.76, -0.34], p=0.041). The inter-class group had a better effect, although not significantly, on reducing exacerbations (Δinter-intra -0.37 [-0.77, 0.02], p=0.124) and increasing lung function (FEV1) (126.8 ml [-12.7, 266.4], p=0.124). ConclusionAfter anti-IL-5/5R mAb insufficient response, switching to dupilumab demonstrated similar improvement in ACT scores compared to intra-class switching. However, it appeared more effective in reducing oral corticosteroid use. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.