Abstract
Gadolinium anomalies have become a well-established marker for the pollution caused by wastewater, but there is not yet a standardized method to estimate the anomaly. Here, we compare four different published equations, distinct threshold values and reference normalizing values to estimate Gd anomalies by applying them to the results of a hydrochemical investigation in an alluvial aquifer with on-site sanitation systems. We measured traditional wastewater markers (such as electric conductivity, NO3_N, NH4–N, Cl-) and REE in groundwater samples collected from hand-dug wells in two seasons. The ratios of Gd normalized measured concentrations to Gd normalized geogenic concentrations (GdSN/Gd*) estimated with the various methods ranged from 0.7 to 2.8. It turned out that the choice of the equation and the threshold value can affect the decisions about anthropogenic pollution’s occurrence (or not). The normalizing values did not play a significant role in the decision. Based on measurement uncertainties and on the interpretation of hydrogeological conditions in the study area, a threshold value of 1.3 for defining anthropogenic Gd anomalies was deemed adequate for the study area. The occurrence of Gd anomalies higher than 1.8 in two wells, one in each season, reinforces the hypothesis that the groundwater is contaminated by the on-site sanitation systems in the study area, as intermittent detection of anthropogenic Gd is a characteristic of this pollution source.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.