Abstract
This article deals with the analyse of “Proslogion” of Anselm of Canterbury and examines the apophatic aspects of “unum argumentum”. In the conclusion it shows a number of specific apories that characterize Anselm’s thought. It makes a suggestion about the role of the “fool” from 14th Psalm in the elaboration of this argument.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
