Abstract

Increasing power demand from passive distribution networks has led to deteriorated voltage profiles and increased line flows. This has increased the annual operations and installation costs due to unavoidable reinforcement equipment. This work proposes the reduction in annual costs by optimal placement of capacitors used to alleviate power loss in radial distribution networks (RDNs). The optimization objective function is formulated for the reduction in operation costs by (i) reducing the active and reactive power losses, and (ii) the cost and installation of capacitors, necessary to provide the reactive power support and maintain the voltage profile. Initially, the network buses are ranked according to two loss sensitivity indices (LSIs), i.e., active loss sensitivity with respect to node voltage (LSI1) and reactive power injection (LSI2). The sorted bus list is then fed to the particle swarm optimization (PSO) for solving the objective function. The efficacy of the proposed work is tested on different IEEE standard networks (34 and 85 nodes) for different use cases and load conditions. In use case 1, the values finalized by the algorithm are selected without considering their market availability, whereas in use case 2, market-available capacitor sizes close to the optimal solution are selected. Furthermore, the static and seasonal load profiles are considered. The results are compared with recent methods and have shown significant improvement in terms of annual cost, losses and line flows reduction, and voltage profile.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilIncreases in power losses at the consumer’s end necessitates an increase in the generation of energy, and its effects on the power system are manifold

  • To test the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method, static and seasonal load profiles are considered, termed as case study 1 (CS1 ) and case study 2 (CS2 ), respectively

  • For N2, some new capacitors are needed to be installed at new locations for this specific season to ensure better annual cost savings in both use cases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increases in power losses at the consumer’s end necessitates an increase in the generation of energy, and its effects on the power system are manifold. While it increases the operation and maintenance costs, it increases the stress on the power system, leading to the voltage profile deterioration and several other challenges [1]. It is noteworthy that the losses and voltage profile significantly depend upon the reactive power injection. Reactive power injection, if done optimally, can be more time- and cost-efficient [2].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call