Abstract

Simple SummaryDairy barns with compost-bedded pack housing systems are relatively new in Europe. They have housing systems that are vastly different from traditional tie-stall or cubicle housing and provide possibilities for improved animal welfare. However, it is important to investigate how actual cow health is influenced. We used readily available data from 32 dairy herds throughout Europe, half of which had compost-bedded pack housing and half cubicle housing, to investigate differences in dairy cow health. We found that herds with compost-bedded packs had poorer udder health than did herds with cubicles, while they seemed to have fewer problems with reproductive disorders. Our conclusion was that there were few, relatively minor differences between the systems. This knowledge is valuable for farmers interested in applying new housing systems for dairy cows and for consumers who want to stay informed about production conditions in dairy herds.The purpose of this study was to compare animal health in compost-bedded pack (CBP) and cubicle housing (CH) systems using data from dairy herd improvement associations. Thirty-two commercial dairy farms located in Austria, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Slovenia, and Sweden were included in the study. A matching design (pairing CBP and CH within country) according to herd selection criteria was used. We explored the following health indicators: somatic cell counts (SCC), high SCC, new high SCC, ketosis risk, prolonged calving intervals, dystocia, and stillbirth. Traits for culling and culling-related issues, such as length of life and length of productive life, were also included. We used multivariable (mixed) linear and logistic regression models to evaluate differences between the systems. Udder health, as measured by SCC, was inferior in CBP, although the geometric means were low in both systems. The incidence of stillbirths was higher in CBP, while prolonged calving intervals were fewer, indicating that there were fewer reproductive disorders. There were no differences in longevity between the systems, although CBP had lower proportions of first calvers. Overall, we conclude that there were few and minor differences in health and longevity between the CBP and CH systems in the European context.

Highlights

  • Animal housing affects the physical, physiological, and behavioral aspects of farm animals, so it has an impact on their health and welfare [1]

  • The aim of this study was to assess cattle health in compost-bedded pack (CBP) and cubicle housing (CH) systems based on health indicator traits (somatic cell counts (SCC), high SCC, new high SCC, ketosis risk, prolonged calving intervals, dystocia, and stillbirth), and other traits from dairy herd improvement (DHI) records collected in six European countries

  • We found relatively small differences in health between herds with CBP and CH systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal housing affects the physical, physiological, and behavioral aspects of farm animals, so it has an impact on their health and welfare [1]. The design of housing facilities and management practices are important elements of future farm systems because they affect sustainability aspects, such as the environment, cattle health and welfare, and economics [2]. Recent reports in the EU, based on official audits and a literature review [6,7], show that housing systems are major factors influencing animal welfare and that the welfare of dairy cows is insufficiently monitored. They show that lameness, mastitis, metabolic diseases, and reproductive problems remain critical areas, confirming that there are major animal health and welfare issues across different dairy production systems. The most important issues to be improved compromise of cleanliness, which has been linked to mastitis [8,9], and a high prevalence of claw lesions in dairy cows [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.