Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison of outcomes with the VATS versus open approach

Abstract

7616 Background: Anatomic segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC has been proposed as a means of achieving a complete resection in high-risk patients with poor lung function, who might not otherwise tolerate conventional lobectomy. Historically, anatomic segmentectomy has been associated with increased recurrence rates and postoperative air leaks. In the current study, we present our experience with VATS versus open segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC. Methods: A total of 181 consecutive anatomic segmentectomies (114 Open, 67 VATS) were performed for Stage IA (n=110) or IB (n=71) NSCLC from 2002–2006. A VATS approach was employed in 67 patients, and an open approach in 114 patients. Outcome variables include hospital course, complications, mortality, recurrence patterns and survival. Results: The mean age was 70 years (range: 45–100). Average tumor size was 2.3 cm (2.0 cm VATS; 2.4 cm open, NS). Lymph node sampling or dissection was performed in 169 (93%) of patients with an average node harvest of 8.2 nodes (Open = 9.2; VATS = 6.2, p=0.006). There were two perioperative deaths (1.1%), both open. Complications occurred in 59 patients (33%). Median length of stay was 6 days (VATS=5, Open=7). Mean follow-up was 15.6 months. There were fewer major (7 vs. 31, p=0.005) and infectious (3 vs. 12%, p=0.026) complications in the VATS group, with no significant difference in pulmonary complications or air leaks. Twenty-nine recurrences (16%; VATS=7, Open=22) occurred at a mean of 12.7 months [11 locoregional (6%), 18 distant (10%)]. Overall mortality, complications, recurrence and two-year actuarial survival (78%) were similar between VATS and open segmentectomy. Conclusions: VATS segmentectomy can be performed safely with acceptable morbidity, mortality, recurrence and survival. The VATS approach affords a shorter length of stay and fewer postoperative complications (major and infectious) compared with open techniques. The potential benefits of segmentectomy will need to be further validated by prospective, randomized trials (ACOSOG Z4032). Sublobar resection techniques represent an important adjunct in treating compromised patients with early stage NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.