Abstract
ABSTRACT The general objective of this study is to analyze whether the particularities of audited companies influence the volume of key audit matters (KAMs). Its specific objectives are to identify the number of KAMs disclosed by Brazilian companies and analyze the main factors associated with their disclosure. The paper aims to contribute to an area of investigation still lacking in studies that analyze the factors affecting KAM disclosure, which makes audit reports more individualized. The study contributes to understanding the main auditing issues in Brazilian companies that auditors consider relevant, by providing evidence on factors associated with their disclosure. This research is relevant for agencies that issue auditing standards and for financial information users. For issuers of auditing standards, the study is relevant because it identifies the factors associated with KAM disclosure, enabling it to be confirmed that the new audit report model has contributed to its destandardization. For financial information users, the study demonstrates that KAM disclosure varies from company to company, thus contributing to greater transparency of the audit report. Data were collected from the Audit Reports and Consolidated Financial Statements of the 447 Brazilian companies listed on the São Paulo Securities, Commodities, and Futures Exchange (BM&FBovespa), on December 31st of 2016, and an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was applied to the defined model. The results show a positive relationship between the number of KAMs disclosed and both the auditor being a Big 4 and the complexity of the audited company. The auditor’s fees and auditor’s opinion being modified show a negative relationship with the number of KAMs. The article is relevant for companies, auditors, and regulatory and supervisory bodies as it identifies company characteristics that influence KAM disclosure and are determinants for the non-standardization of the auditor’s report.
Highlights
Catarina Ferreira & Ana Isabel MoraisThe international financial crisis and development of the Brazilian financial market contributed to reinforcing the importance of having independent audits of financial statements that are carried out with quality (Braunbeck, 2010)
With relation to the mean Key Audit Matters (KAMs) value per company in other countries, the United Kingdom shows a mean of 4.1 KAMs and France and Cyprus have an average of two KAMs in their audit reports [Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), 2018; Bédard et al, 2014]
This study aims to identify the number of KAMs reported for Brazilian listed companies and verify what the determinants of that disclosure are
Summary
Catarina Ferreira & Ana Isabel MoraisThe international financial crisis and development of the Brazilian financial market contributed to reinforcing the importance of having independent audits of financial statements that are carried out with quality (Braunbeck, 2010). According to Lin and Hwang (2010), external auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on financial statements in order to ensure, to a reasonable extent, that they reflect relevant information and reliably represent the financial situation and results presented by a company From this analysis emerges the audit report. The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) issued International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701 – Communication of Key Audit Matters (KAMs), in January of 2015 (IAASB, 2015) This new chapter in the audit report consists of disclosing areas that, according to the auditors, have been shown to be critical over the course of their analysis and are relevant for understanding the work carried out by them, as well as the company’s financial statements. This standard aims to align audit reports in different countries and enable a more comprehendible language for financial statement users (Matos, Santos, Rodrigues & Leite, 2018)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have