Abstract
Ride comfort indices are used to evaluate the vibration of rail vehicles and to measure the discomfort of passengers. Among the various ride comfort indices, the Sperling index is widely used in China and other countries. However, there are several different methods for determining the Sperling index from dynamic simulations and performance measurements of rail vehicles, and the results obtained by different algorithms are inconsistent. It is therefore difficult to make an accurate evaluation with the different calculation results. In this paper, a comparison is made between algorithms based on time domain and frequency domain analysis and using the second and third powers of the acceleration. The different algorithms are then summarised into a unified equation, and the consistency of the results is analysed by this equation. It is found that only the r.m.s-based algorithm in the time or frequency domain is stable when analysis is carried out over different sample times. The time-frequency consistency of the r.m.s-based algorithms is verified by Parsevalās theorem and using calculation results from time domain simulations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.