Analysis Of "Slug Test" Dst Flow Period Data With Critical Flow

Abstract

Abstract In field data from slug test (decreasing flow rate) DSTS, an initial period of constant flow rate can often be observed. This may be a consequence of critical flow. "Critical flow" means that flow rate is independent of the pressure drop across the flow restriction. In the case of compressible fluid flow, this implies that the flow velocity is equal to the sonic velocity in the fluid. This was suggested by Ramey et al. in 1975. However, critical (constant-rate) flow was not included in their analysis of slug test DST flow period data. A new method which does consider an initial constant flow rate for a slug test was found. Graphs for the type-curve matching method are presented and field data are shown. Introduction Often in drill stem testing, the flow periods are characterized by a pressure trace which increases with increasing time, showing the accumulation of liquid in the drill string. In the expected case, the pressure-time trace is linear, showing constant-rate pressure-time trace is linear, showing constant-rate production. In other cases, the pressure-time trace production. In other cases, the pressure-time trace curves and is concave to the time axis. This shows a decreasing flow rate. In the case that formation pressure is too low to lift a column of reservoir pressure is too low to lift a column of reservoir liquid to the surface, the well may stop flowing before the tester valve is closed. This results because the head of liquid in the drill string becomes equal to initial formation pressure. This sort of test is similar to a pressure transient test called a "slug test" by Ferris and Knowles in 1954. The word "slug" refers to the maximum volume of liquid which may be produced by the time the well becomes static. produced by the time the well becomes static. A similar test involving the cooling of a batch of hot water was reported by Beck, Jaeger, and Newstead in 1956. Cooper et al., in 1967, reported the results of a field test in a static water well from which a float was suddenly removed, giving the appearance of the sudden removal of a quantity of water equal to that displaced by the float. Maier presented an approximate analysis of the equivalent DST presented an approximate analysis of the equivalent DST problem in 1970. problem in 1970.Van Poollen et al., in 1970, and Kohlhass, in 1972, applied the Cooper et al. solution to DST flow period data analysis. Although most current studies period data analysis. Although most current studies reference a study by Jaeger in 1956 which included a sandface resistance similar to the skin effect, most recent works do not include wellbore damage effects. A solution including the skin effect was presented by Ramey and Agarwal in 1972, although use of the solutions was not demonstrated. Papadopulos et al. presented extended results for the zero skin effect presented extended results for the zero skin effect case in 1973. The most complete discussion of DST applications of the slug test was presented in 1975. Three new slug test type-curves were developed for analysis of flow period data, and three field cases were analyzed. This study was included in the Earlougher monograph in 1977, and large-scale type-curves were printed with that monograph. printed with that monograph. Finally, Fenske showed that pressure buildup data for a well produced a short time (with wellbore storage) would follow the slug test type-curves. This is a potent observation. It means that the slug test type-curves may work for the initial shut-in, as well as for flow period data. This establishes the importance of slug test type-curves for DST work whether the test would normally be classified a "slug test" or not. Although not within the scope of this study, slug test type-curves may be used to match the initial shut-in for a DST following a very short initial flow to provide permeability, skin effect, and extrapolated initial pressure. One of the most important observations made from attempts to match field data with slug test type-curves is that there is often an initial constant-rate flow period before the rate begins to decline. Reference period before the rate begins to decline. Reference 1 pointed out this phenomena was related to conventional DST results for liquid flow wherein flow rate was constant for both flow periods: "Before proceeding with the presentation of the 'slug test', it should be pointed out that the conventional DST… contains the seed of a paradox.