Abstract

High-precision isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) systems are equipped with digitizers that deliver effective maximum digitization depths of 16 to 24 bits; however, there are no analyses of the proper board depth required to retain high precision in continuous-flow techniques. We report an experimental and theoretical evaluation of quantization error in continuous-flow IRMS (CF-IRMS). CO 2 samples (100 pmol–30 nmol) were injected into a gas chromatography combustion IRMS system (GC–CIRMS). The analog signal was digitized by high precision, 24-bit ADC boards at 10 Hz, and was post-processed to simulate 12, 14, and 16-bit data sets. δ 13 C pdb values were calculated for all data sets by the conventional “summation” method or by curve-fitting the chromatographic peaks to the exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) function. Benchmarks of S.D.( δ 13 C pdb ) = 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0‰ were considered to assess precision. In the presence of significant quantization noise, curve-fitting required several-fold less CO 2 than the summation method to reach a given benchmark. We derived an equation to describe the theoretical limitations of precision for the summation method as a function of CO 2 admitted to the source and the step size of the boards. Theory was in close agreement with the observed lower limit of precision for the simulated 16-bit data set. Curve-fitting achieved a precision of S.D. <0.3‰ for injections 20-fold smaller than summation for CO 2 samples collected on an IRMS with 16-bit resolution. By mitigating the impact of quantization noise, curve-fitting expands the dynamic range within a single run to include lower analyte levels, and effectively reduces the need for high pumping capacities and high precision ADC boards.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call