Abstract

Continuous improvement of the medical care in Ukraine substantiates the need for development appropriate approaches for evaluating the quality of the iatrogenic interventions and rehabilitation measures. The success of treatment mostly depends on the adequacy of the primary diagnosis of the patient or the victim and the corresponding registration of present functional and structural violations at the time of admission. This stage of complex rehabilitation, in addition, plays an important role during forensic examinations that aimed at identifying the fact of a medical mistake, establishing conformity of medical care provision taking into account the initial clinical conditions and quantifying the effectiveness of treatment and prevention measures at the stage of long-term post-therapy monitoring. During provided retrospective analysis of publications, the following systems (algorithms) of the quantification of maxillofacial injuries were identified: Cooter-David Score, ISS, AIS, TRISS, MFISS, FFSS, ZS, AO/ASIF, FLOSID. The conducted analysis of the systems for quantitative assessment of the injuries parameters at the maxillofacial region indicates about the variability of the above described approaches in terms of topographical distribution of region of interest, criteria for assessing the severity of functional and structural violations, as well as in the terms of corresponding filling registration cards or computerized forms in relation to the specifics of methodological algorithm.

Highlights

  • Therapeutic-diagnostic and tactic-organizational mistakes (25,4% of cases) were the most often among the nursing personnel

  • The structure of improper medical care provided by nursing personnel were analyzed

  • Forensic medical expert commissions found objective reasons of the improper medical care provided by nursing personnel in 16 cases (55.2%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Therapeutic-diagnostic (found in 26,8 % of cases) and tactic-organizational mistakes (25,4% of cases) were the most often among the nursing personnel. В ході проведеного ретроспективного аналізу публікацій було виокремлено наступні системи (алгоритми) кількісної оцінки пошкоджень щелепно-лицевої області в результаті травм різної етіології: Cooter-David Score, ISS, AIS, TRISS, MFISS, FFSS, ZS, AO/ASIF, FLOSID.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.