Abstract

Medium-scale solar hot water systems with a total solar panel area varying from 60 to 166 m2 have been installed in Lithuania since 2002. However, the performance of these systems varies depending on the type of energy users, equipment and design of the systems, as well as their maintenance. The aim of this paper was to analyse operational SHW systems from the perspective of energy production and economic benefit as well as to outline the differences of their actual performance compared to the numerical simulation results. Three different medium-scale solar thermal systems in Lithuania were selected for the analysis varying in both equipment used (flat type solar collectors, evacuated tube collectors) and type of energy user (swimming pool building, domestic hot water heating, district heating). The results of the analysis showed that in the analysed cases the gap between measured and modelled data of heat energy produced by SHW systems was approx. 11%. From the economical perspective, the system with flat type solar collectors used for domestic hot water production was proved to be most efficient. However, calculation of Internal Rate of Return showed that a grant of 35% is required for this project to be fully profitable.

Highlights

  • Solar water heating (SHW) is one of the most common solar thermal applications

  • Performance parameters were calculated for a standard year and compared to the measured heat energy production

  • The results of the analysis presented in this study showed that medium scale SHW systems with solar flat plate and evacuated tube collectors can produce from 343 to 488 kWh/m2 heat energy in the case when the efficiency of these systems varies in the range of 24 to 44%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solar water heating (SHW) is one of the most common solar thermal applications. In 2012 the world added 55.4 GWth (more than 79 million m2) of solar heat capacity [1]. The European market contracted again for the newly installed capacity in 2012, which totalled 2.14 GWth This represents a decrease of 11.8% in comparison with 2012. The total installed capacity increased by 1.75 GWth, attaining 30.2 GWth (43.1 million m2).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call