Abstract
The development of sharia-based products in Indonesia have been increasingly rife, one of the most growing is rahn/Islamic pawn. Basically, a pawn contract is a type of tabarru’/voluntary contract which does not generate profit, however there are many Islamic financial institutions that offer pawn products especially gold pawn product. This research aims to analyze the comparison between the AAOIFI and DSN-MUI in the provisions regarding gold pawn contract. This research is a type of literature study using descriptive qualitative approach. The finding of research is that there are similarities and differences between both AAOIFI and DSN-MUI in the provisions regarding gold pawn contract. The most salient difference is that the Fatwa of DSN-MUI allows the Islamic financial institutions as the mortgagee to charge to the mortgagor some fees for safekeeping and maintenance of the mortgaged asset through ijarah contract, which make the gold pawn contract become profitable for the mortgagee. Unlike in the AAOIFI Shariah Standard which does not give the mortgagee a chance to obtain profit from this contract. Keywords: Rahn, Gold Pawn, AAOIFI, DSN-MUI
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
