Abstract
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare predictive and post-treatment dosimetry and analyze the differences, investigating factors related to activity preparation and delivery, imaging modality used, and interventional radiology.MethodsTwenty-three HCC patients treated by selective internal radiation therapy with 90Y glass microspheres were included in this study. Predictive and post-treatment dosimetry were calculated at the voxel level based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-microsphere PET/CT respectively. Dose distribution was analyzed through mean dose, metrics extracted from dose-volume histograms, and Dice similarity coefficients applied on isodoses. Reproducibility of the radiological gesture and its influence on dose deviation was evaluated.Results90Y delivered activity was lower than expected in 67% (16/24) of the cases mainly due to the residual activity. A mean deviation of − 6 ± 11% was observed between the delivered activity and the 90Y PET’s FOV activity. In addition, a substantial difference of − 20 ± 8% was measured on 90Y PET images between the activity in the liver and in the whole FOV. After normalization, 99mTc-MAA SPECT dosimetry was highly correlated and concordant with 90Y-microsphere PET dosimetry for all dose metrics evaluated (ρ = 0.87, ρc = 0.86, P = 3.10−8 and ρ = 0.91, ρc = 0.90, P = 7.10−10 for tumor and normal liver mean dose respectively for example). Besides, mean tumor dose deviation was lower when the catheter position was identical than when it differed (16 Gy vs. 37 Gy, P = 0.007). Concordance between predictive and post-treatment dosimetry, evaluated with Dice similarity coefficients applied on isodoses, significantly correlated with the distance of the catheter position from artery bifurcation (P = 0.04, 0.0004, and 0.05, for 50 Gy, 100 Gy, and 150 Gy isodoses respectively).ConclusionsDiscrepancies between planned activity and activity measured on 90Y PET images were observed and seemed to be mainly related to clinical hazards and equipment issues. Predictive vs. post-treatment comparison of relative dose distributions between tumor and normal liver showed a good correlation and no significant difference highlighting the predictive value of 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT-based dosimetry. Besides, the reproducibility of catheter tip position appears critical in the agreement between predictive and actual dose distribution.
Highlights
The aim of this study was to compare predictive and post-treatment dosimetry and analyze the differences, investigating factors related to activity preparation and delivery, imaging modality used, and interventional radiology
Gnesin et al compared predictive and delivered doses to the tumor and normal liver (NL) calculated at the voxel level based on the 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT and 90Y-microsphere PET/CT for both glass and resin microsphere Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) [5]
They concluded that the predictive dose based on the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT is a valuable predictor of post-treatment dosimetry with discrepancies in some specific patient cases
Summary
The aim of this study was to compare predictive and post-treatment dosimetry and analyze the differences, investigating factors related to activity preparation and delivery, imaging modality used, and interventional radiology. Gnesin et al compared predictive and delivered doses to the tumor and normal liver (NL) calculated at the voxel level based on the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-microsphere PET/CT for both glass and resin microsphere SIRT [5]. They concluded that the predictive dose based on the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT is a valuable predictor of post-treatment dosimetry with discrepancies in some specific patient cases. According to Gnesin et al and Song et al, discrepancies between pre- and post-treatment dose estimates may be attributed to different factors which respective influence remain unclear: flow differences between MAA and microspheres, catheter position deviations, differences between imaging modalities used, etc
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have