Abstract

IntroductionIn an effort to enhance the quality of mechanized endodontic instruments, various thermal treatment methods, and design modifications have been suggested. However, upon evaluation, these endodontic instruments may exhibit microscopic irregularities. The objective of this in vitro study was to analyze the cutting capacity, surface finish, and mechanical properties of Nickel-Titanium 25/.04 Rotate (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and LOGIC 2 (Easy Equipamentos Odontológicos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil) rotary instruments. MethodologyTwenty rotary instruments were divided into 2 groups: GR, the group with ROTATE instruments (n = 10); and GL2, the group with LOGIC 2 instruments (n = 10). They were evaluated for roughness, using a profilometer, for bending resistance, buckling resistance, and cutting capacity using a universal testing machine, as well as for torsional strength (torque and angular deflection) using a torquemeter. The instruments were visualized before and after the mechanical tests through scanning electron microscopy. ResultsGR showed better surface finish in terms of roughness, greater cutting capacity, and greater angular deflection than GL2 (P < .05). However, GL2 showed better flexibility than GR (P < .05). GL2 and GR did not show statistically significant differences in terms of buckling and torque (P > .05). ConclusionThe ROTATE and LOGIC 2 rotary instruments differed in their surface finish, cutting capacity, and mechanical properties, except for their buckling resistance and required fracture torque.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call