Analysis of Complex Protein Mixtures with Improved Sequence Coverage Using (CE−MS/MS)n

Abstract

Identification of proteins, in a complex protein mixture, using one-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) analysis of its digest, usually suffers from low sequence coverage. There are several reasons for the low coverage including undersampling, wide concentration dynamic range of the proteins in a complex protein mixture, and wide range of electrospray ionization efficiency of peptides under each mobile-phase composition. To address this low sequence coverage, we introduce a novel technique, (CE-MS/MS)n, which utilizes the most significant advantages of CE-MS/MS, including economy of sample size, fast analysis time, and high separation efficiency, to increase the sequence coverage of a complex protein mixture. Based on these characteristics, (CE-MS/MS)n can be performed in which multiple CE-MS/MS subanalyses (injections followed by analyses) are analyzed and experimental variables are manipulated during each CE-MS/MS subanalysis in order to maximize sequence coverage. (CE-MS/MS)n is a practical technique since each CE-MS/MS subanalysis consumes <10 nL, and each CE-MS/MS subanalysis takes approximately 10 min; therefore, several subanalyses can be performed in approximately 1 h consuming only nanoliters of the sample. Two techniques have been introduced to address the undersampling: (1) (CE-MS/MS)n using dynamic exclusion. In this technique, several CE-MS/MS analyses (injection followed by separation) were performed in one run using the dynamic exclusion capability of the mass spectrometer until all peptide peaks were analyzed by MS/MS. (2) Gas-phase fractionation. In this technique, (CE-MS/MS)n is performed by scanning a narrow mass range (every approximately 100 m/z) during each CE-MS/MS subanalysis without using dynamic exclusion. Under this condition, in each subanalysis, the number of peptides available for MS/MS analysis is significantly reduced, and peptides with the same nominal masses are analyzed, thereby increasing sequence coverage. Additionally, to address the lack of detection of low-level peptides in a mixture containing a wide concentration dynamic range, the concentration of the sample was systematically increased in each subanalysis (while utilizing dynamic exclusion) so that low-intensity peptides would rise above the mass spectrometer threshold and, consequently, undergo MS/MS analysis. Moreover, to alter the ionization efficiency of peptides with low electrospray ionization efficiency, and to change the migration behavior of comigrating peptides under a specific liquid composition, the CE background electrolyte was modified in several subanalyses to further improve sequence coverage. The combination of the above-mentioned techniques was applied to the analysis of the tryptic digests of three well-characterized protein mixtures: a six-protein mixture with average MW of approximately 26,000 (standard I), a six-protein mixture with an average MW approximately 49,000 (standard II), and a more complex protein mixture containing 55 proteins (E. coli ribosomal proteins). In approximately 1 h, when the MS/MS of the peptides were manually checked, all peptides that produced peaks under electrospray ionization in the scanned range of the analysis (500-2000 m/z) and within the practical fragmentation capability of the MS (peptides with MW <3500) were identified for standard I by consuming only 200 fmol of each protein. When searched against a Swissprot database, the average sequence coverage for the standard I, II, and E. coli's ribosomal proteins were 57, 34, and 15%, respectively.