ANALISIS YURIDIS KESEPAKATAN MENENTUKAN HARGA ANTAR PENGUSAHA SEPEDA MOTOR (MATIC) PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA

Abstract

Based on the provisions regarding the legal requirements of an as regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, then in an agreement, the conditions for the validity of the specified in the law of the article must be fulfilled. The conditions for the validity of the as regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code are cumulative; it means that the non-fulfillment of one of the conditions of the provisions of the article will result in the cancellation or the can be cancelled. This study aims to determine the legal provisions of the in determining the price of an item among businessmen in the perspective of the Civil Code, and the validity along the legal consequences of an or on agreements in determining the price of motorcycle among motorcycle entrepreneurs based on the Civil Code. From a civil law perspective, the alleged occurrence of a cartel carried out between PT. Yamaha Indonesia Motor Manufacturing (PT. YIMM) and PT. Astra Honda Motor (PT AHM) in selling automatic motorcycles type 110-125 cc has not fulfilled the elements of Article 5 of Law no. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. In this case, KPPU has not been able to fully prove the existence of an agreement between PT. Yamaha Indonesia Motor (PT. YIMM) and PT. Astra Honda Motor (PT AHM) in determining the price agreement. The legal consequence of price in determining the prices based on a civil law perspective is an act that is against the law, namely Law no. 5 of 1999, so that an or on agreements in determining the prices is an or on agreements that is contrary to the law, which has legal consequences of the cancellation or get the cancellation of the agreement. Keywords : Agreement, Motorcycle Entrepreneur, Civil Law.