Abstract
Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Procedure Code), has set the evidence that can be done in front of the trial. Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code implies that a minimum of 2 (two) valid evidence are required. Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code regulates valid evidence, namely: witness statements; expert statements; letter; instructions; and the statement of the defendant. However, since the trial of Jesica Kumala Wongso which was broadcast on television almost every day, it turns out there is one more proof that is not contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, namely: digital evidence. The object of this study is the Medan District Court Decision No. 3168/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Mdn., Dated May 23, 2019, concerning the use of digital evidence An. Defendant HDL Alias ​​Himma for alleged "criminal acts of hate speech". Law No. 11 of 2008 as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Information and Electronic Transaction Law which governs electronic evidence. The problems in this study, namely: the position of proof of digital evidence before the trial is associated with criminal conviction; use of digital evidence in criminal acts of hate speech on social media; and juridical analysis of digital evidence in proving criminal acts of hate speech in Medan District Court Decision No. 3168/Pid.Sus/ 2018/PN.Mdn.
Highlights
ABSTRAK Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, telah mengatur bukti-bukti yang bisa dilakukan di depan persidangan
Law No 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, has set the evidence that can be done in front of the trial
Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code implies that a minimum of 2 valid evidence are required
Summary
ABSTRAK Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (selanjutnya disebut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana), telah mengatur bukti-bukti yang bisa dilakukan di depan persidangan. Vol 3 No 2 Juli 2021 bukti ilmiah atau digital evidence telah diakui dalam peradilan di Indonesia sebagai salah satu bukti yang dapat digunakan hakim untuk menghukum seorang terdakwa sesuai Pasal 183 KUHAP.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
