Abstract
This study aims to compare the pattern of the Jumlah Ismiyyah and Fi'liyyah in Arabic with subject+predicate in Indonesian in terms of meaning and provisions and its implementation in several appropriate methods. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research approach. Data collection uses the documentation method. The data analysis technique uses contrastive analysis that compares the pattern of the number of Ismiyyah and Fi'liyyah in Arabic with subject+predicate in Indonesian in terms of meaning and provisions. The results show: Among the similarities and differences in the number of Ismiyyah and Fi'liyyah and 'subject+predicate' are: a) the pattern of the number of ismiyyah such as the sentence "Zaidun Ja'a" has the meaning always and remains in the sentence, while in Indonesian it only has meaning "Zaid is coming" only. b) The number of Ismiyyah has provisions between mubtada 'and khabar must be compatible in terms of mufrod, tasniyyah, and jama'. While the arrangement of the predicate subject in Indonesian does not require harmony in this regard and c) The number of fi'liyyah "Ja'a Zaidun" has a new meaning in the sentence, while in Indonesian it only means "Zaid comes". 2) the implementation of this contrastive analysis can be applied in learning the lecture and demonstration methods.
 
 Abstrak
 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan pola jumlah Ismiyyah dan Fi’liyyah dalam bahasa Arab dengan subjek+predikat dalam bahasa Indonesia dari segi makna dan ketentuan serta implementasinya pada beberapa metode yang sesuai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan library research. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis kontrastif yang membandingkan antara pola jumlah Ismiyyah dan Fi’liyyah dalam bahasa Arab dengan subjek+predikat dalam bahasa Indonesia dari segi makna dan ketentuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: Di Antara persamaan dan perbedaan jumlah Ismiyyah dan Fi’liyyah dan ‘subjek+predikat” adalah: a) pola jumlah ismiyyah seperti kalimat “Zaidun Ja’a” memiliki makna selalu dan tetap dalam kalimatnya, sedangkan dalam BI hanya memiliki arti “Zaid datang” saja. b) Jumlah Ismiyyah memiliki ketentuan antara mubtada’ dan khabar harus serasi dalam segi mufrod, tasniyyah, dan jama’. Sedangkan susunan subjek predikat dalam BI tidak mengharuskan keserasian dalam hal tersebut dan c) Jumlah fi’liyyah “Ja’a Zaidun” memiliki makna baru dalam kalimatnya, sedangkan dalam BI hanya sekadar memiliki arti “Zaid datang” saja. 2) implementasi analisis kontrastif ini dapat diterapkan di pembelajaran pada metode ceramah dan demonstrasi
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Tsaqofiya : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.