Analgesic efficacy of programmed intermittent epidural bolus vs patient-controlled epidural analgesia in laboring parturients.

Abstract

Background and Aims:Programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) may produce more extensive spread of epidural bolus rather than continuous epidural infusion (CEI). Previous studies compared PIEB with CEI and concluded that PIEB shows better outcome when combined with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), but these studies lack any comparison between PCEA and PIEB in the absence of CEI.Material and Methods:In this open labeled, prospective, randomized, controlled study 50 parturient were randomly assigned to two groups of 25 each. Group 1 received PCEA bolus of 5 ml (0.1% levobupivacaine plus 2mcg/ml fentanyl) with 15 min lockout interval with provision of rescue clinician bolus of 5 ml of same drug for breakthrough pain. Group 2 received physician-administered PIEB with same parameters as Group 1. The primary outcome was to assess total consumption of levobupivacaine plus fentanyl mixture, in PIEB vs. PCEA group, corrected for duration of labor (ml/h) and secondary outcomes included pain score, maternal satisfaction, maternal, and neonatal characteristics.Results:The hourly mean drug consumption in the PCEA group was significantly lower as compared with the physician-administered PIEB group (5.46 ml/h, SD 2.01 vs. 6.55 ml/h, SD 1.28; P = 0.03). The median total number of rescue boluses consumed were less in the PCEA group when compared with the PIEB group (0 vs. 1; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups with regard to pain scores, maternal hemodynamics, maternal and fetal outcome and adverse effects.Conclusion: PCEA may be better than physician-administered PIEB in providing effective labor analgesia with comparable safety.