Abstract
PurposeTo determine the current U.S. practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures. Methods and MaterialsA 27-item survey created with expertise from five brachytherapists was distributed electronically to 90 U.S. Radiation Oncology academic programs and publicized on social media and at two national meetings during June-October 2023. ResultsForty-one responses were received (46%). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% Caucasian and 85% non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty nine percent utilize a BT suite +/- CT simulator alone, 39% the operating room +/- BT suite or CT simulator or other location, 10% CT simulation room alone, and 2% clinic exam room. Thirty four percent utilize general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n=41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, and 9% spinal or epidural AS alone, and 27% combination. Among those performing hybrid BT (n=25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, and 4% OA alone, and 28% combination. For template interstitial BT (n=25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of respondents provide AG or AS during applicator placement only, while 32% provide it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most common reasons for not using CS or GA were lack of anesthesia resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to alleviate BT related emotional distress. ConclusionsMany U.S. brachytherapists report using GA, CS or epidural AS, yet 10% are using only OA and 22% offer AG/AS only during applicator placement. Furthermore, a majority of respondents believe PTSD symptoms can occur after BT, but few offer any intervention. AS resources and clinician preference should be targeted for expansion of higher quality care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.