Abstract

This paper presents a review of 100 empirical papers studying corporate codes of ethics (CCEs) in business organizations from the time period mid-2005 until mid-2016, following approximately an 11-year time period after the previous review of the literature. The reviewed papers are broadly categorized as content-oriented, output-oriented, or transformation-oriented. The review sheds light on empirical focus, context, questions addressed, methods, findings and theory. The findings are discussed in terms of the three categories as well as the aggregate, stock of empirical CCE studies in comparison with previous reviews, answering the question “where are we now?” Content and output studies still stand for the majority of the studies, whereas the transformation studies are fewer. Within these areas, two new trends are found to have emerged: discursive analyses and a focus on labor conditions. The review finds that (a) the content of CCEs is still predominantly self-defensive, (b) that CCEs are insufficient in themselves in terms of protecting workers’ rights, (c) that CCEs are likely to encounter tensions when implemented across national and organizational boundaries, and (d) that while perception of CCEs is generally positive, CCEs may lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Based on these findings, potential areas for further exploration in the area of CCE research are suggested.

Highlights

  • With over a decade having passed since the last publication of a code of ethics literature review, this paper aims to review the current status of empirical research on corporate codes of ethics (CCEs), covering the period from mid-2005 to mid-2016

  • This emergence of the utilization of explicit theory within content papers coincides with the expansion in methodology from a tendency to rely on frequency of mention as the measure for analysis of code content to more sophisticated measures such as lexical software analysis (Béthoux et al 2007), centering resonance analysis (Canary and Jennings 2008), and critical discourse analysis (Winkler 2011)

  • Forsyth and O’Boyle’s (2011) find the greater the degree of relativism expressed by a country’s residents the less likely are the businesses within that country to develop extensive CCEs, but no support for a relationship between degrees of idealism and CCE extensiveness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A succinct version of the Kaptein and Schwartz (2008) definition of a business code is provided by Kaptein (2011), in that, a business code of ethics is “a set [of] prescriptions developed by a company to guide the behavior of managers and employees.”. Taking these definitions together, and for the purposes of our study, we define Corporate Code of Ethics (CCE2) as written and formal documents intended to increase moral resistance

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call