Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric blocking events are mid-latitude weather patterns, which obstruct the usual path of the polar jet streams. They are often associated with heat waves in summer and cold snaps in winter. Despite being central features of mid-latitude synoptic-scale weather, there is no well-defined historical dataset of blocking events. Various blocking indices (BIs) have thus been suggested for automatically identifying blocking events in observational and in climate model data. However, BIs show significant regional and seasonal differences so that several indices are typically applied in combination to ensure scientific robustness. Here, we introduce a new BI using self-organizing maps (SOMs), an unsupervised machine learning approach, and compare its detection skill to some of the most widely applied BIs. To enable this intercomparison, we first create a new ground truth time series classification of European blocking based on expert judgement. We then demonstrate that our method (SOM-BI) has several key advantages over previous BIs because it exploits all of the spatial information provided in the input data and reduces the dependence on arbitrary thresholds. Using ERA5 reanalysis data (1979–2019), we find that the SOM-BI identifies blocking events with a higher precision and recall than other BIs. In particular, SOM-BI already performs well using only around 20 years of training data so that observational records are long enough to train our new method. We present case studies of the 2003 and 2019 European heat waves and highlight that well-defined groups of SOM nodes can be an effective tool to diagnose such weather events, although the domain-based approach can still lead to errors in the identification of certain events in a fashion similar to the other BIs. We further test the red blocking detection skill of SOM-BI depending on the meteorological variable used to study blocking, including geopotential height, sea level pressure and four variables related to potential vorticity, and the 500 hPa geopotential height anomaly field provides the best results with our new approach. We also demonstrate how SOM-BI can be used to identify different types of blocking events and their associated trends. Finally, we evaluate the SOM-BI performance on around 100 years of climate model data from a pre-industrial simulation with the new UK Earth System Model (UKESM1-0-LL). For the model data, all blocking detection methods have lower skill than for the ERA5 reanalysis, but SOM-BI performs noticeably better than the conventional indices. Overall, our results demonstrate the significant potential for unsupervised learning to complement the study of blocking events in both reanalysis and climate modelling contexts.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric blocking events are large-scale mid-latitude anticyclones that can persist for several days, which obstruct the typical westerly flow pattern (Rex, 1950)

  • From the 101 years investigated in the pre-industrial control run we have found the largest extent of heat extremes to occur in an extended heat wave shown in Appendix Fig. A2

  • The 2019 heat wave was concurrent with persistent hot air that originated in North Africa, which was sustained by an omega block centred on western Europe (Mitchell et al, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric blocking events are large-scale mid-latitude anticyclones that can persist for several days, which obstruct the typical westerly flow pattern (Rex, 1950). Blocking systems are often associated with regional extreme weather events, heat waves in summer and cold snaps in winter. C. Thomas et al.: An unsupervised learning approach to identifying blocking events. The 2003 summer heat wave and 2009/10 winter cold events in Europe were both associated with atmospheric blocking (Black et al, 2004; Cattiaux et al, 2010). There is a large seasonal, interannual and decadal variability in the occurrence of blocking (Kennedy et al, 2016; Brunner et al, 2017), which compounds the problem of separating externally forced changes from internal variability (Barnes et al, 2014; Shepherd, 2014). The influence of climate change on blocking remains an open question (Francis and Vavrus, 2012; Barnes, 2013; Hassanzadeh et al, 2014; Barnes and Polvani, 2015; Barnes and Screen, 2015; Francis and Vavrus, 2015; Coumou et al, 2018; Mann et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.