An overview of chalcophile element contents of pyrrhotite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite, and pyrite from magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits

Abstract

We have compiled the trace element concentrations in pyrrhotite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite, and pyrite from magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE ore deposits with the aim of understanding their petrogenesis and whether these minerals can be used as indicator minerals. Among the samples, there are some of the most studied world-class Ni-Cu- (Aguablanca, Duluth, Jinchuan, Noril’sk-Talnakh-Kharaelakh, Sudbury, Voisey’s Bay, and others) and PGE-dominated (Bushveld, Lac des Iles, Stillwater, Great Dyke, and Penikat) deposits. Crustal assimilation may be constrained using As/Se and Sb/Se ratios in pentlandite. The degree of interaction between the silicate and sulfide liquids (R-factor) can be estimated by the content of highly chalcophile elements (Dsulf liq/sil liq above 1000) in sulfide minerals. The fractional crystallization of the sulfide liquid can be traced using Se/Te ratios of pentlandite. Pyrite formed by exsolution from MSS has higher Rh, Ru, Ir, and Os than co-existing pyrrhotite, whereas pyrite formed by hydrothermal alteration of pyrrhotite inherits the Rh, Ru, Ir, and Os contents of the pyrrhotite it replaced. Sulfide minerals are preserved in transported glacial cover and their trace element chemistry can be used to discriminate their source. Pentlandite from Ni-Cu deposits has much lower Rh and Pd concentrations than those from PGE-dominated deposits, pyrite from magmatic deposits has higher Co/Sb and Se/As ratios relative to pyrite from hydrothermal deposits, and chalcopyrite from magmatic deposits has much higher Ni and lower Cd concentrations than those from hydrothermal deposits.