An overlooked source of false positives in eDNA-based biodiversity assessment and management

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation and management in urban aquatic ecosystems is crucial to human welfare, and environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods have become popular in biodiversity assessment. Here we report a highly overlooked source of significant false positives for eDNA-based biodiversity assessment in urban aquatic ecosystems supplied with treated wastewater - eDNA pollution originating from treated wastewater represents a noteworthy source of false positives. To investigate whether eDNA pollution is specific to a certain treatment or prevalent across methods employed by wastewater treatment plants, we conducted tests on effluent treated using three different secondary processes, both before and after upgrades to tertiary treatment. We metabarcoded eDNA collected from effluent immediately after full treatment and detected diverse native and non-native, commercial and ornamental fishes (48 taxa) across all treatment processes before and after upgrades. Thus, eDNA pollution occurred irrespective of the treatment processes applied. Release of eDNA pollution into natural aquatic ecosystems could translate into false positives for eDNA-based analysis. We discuss and propose technical solutions to minimize these false positives in environmental nucleic acid-based biodiversity assessments and conservation programs.