Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) methodology that connects several methods, from geometrical design to post-process selection, into a common optimisation framework. Design/methodology/approach A design methodology is formulated and tested in a case study. The outcome of the case study is analysed by comparing the obtained results with alternative designs achieved by using other design methods. The design process in the case study and the potential of the method to be used in different settings are also discussed. Finally, the work is concluded by stating the main contribution of the paper and highlighting where further research is needed. Findings The proposed method is implemented in a novel framework which is applied to a physical component in the case study. The component is a structural aircraft part that was designed to minimise weight while respecting several static and fatigue structural load cases. An addition goal is to minimise the manufacturing cost. Designs optimised for manufacturing by two different AM machines (EOS M400 and Arcam Q20+), with and without post-processing (centrifugal finishing) are considered. The designs achieved in this study show a significant reduction in both weight and cost compared to one AM manufactured geometry designed using more conventional methods and one design milled in aluminium. Originality/value The method in this paper allows for the holistic design and optimisation of components while considering manufacturability, cost and component functionality. Within the same framework, designs optimised for different setups of AM machines and post-processing can be automatically evaluated without any additional manual work.

Highlights

  • Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is a category of methods and knowledge that aids the design process of components by fully using the advantages of AM

  • A parameter study of the optimal solutions clearly shows that the fatigue loads are limiting the optimisation and better fatigue properties result in lighter designs

  • The traditionally designed geometry is based on the same Topology Optimisation (TO) result as the one in this study, the final design is made by a design engineer which manually recreated the model in a CAD software

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is a category of methods and knowledge that aids the design process of components by fully using the advantages of AM. AM has several advantages over traditional manufacturing, including the manufacturing of small quantities/individual customisation, part consolidation, the creation of lightweight designs and the possibility to create more efficient designs (Gao, 2015; Gibson et al, 2015; Klahn et al, 2015). Traditional design methods, tools and software are often not capable of supporting a design process that fully exploits the possibilities of AM (Simpson, 2017). The difficulty of using the potential, and understanding the limits, of AM complicates the introduction of AM into industry

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call