Abstract

Introduction: Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infection with varied clinical presentations. Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique widely used in the diagnosis of various skin diseases. Objective: To see the correlation between the clinical and dermoscopic features with the histopathological findings in leprosy. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on clinically suspected leprosy patients attending the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) for 18 months. Representative lesions were observed by dermoscopy, and a biopsy was performed, followed by histopathology for final diagnosis. Patients were categorized by Ridley-Jopling classification. Results: A total of 70 clinically suspected leprosy patients were included in the study. Amongst 70 cases, 56 cases were diagnosed as leprosy by dermoscopy, and 53 cases were confirmed as leprosy by histopathology (hematoxylin and eosin [H and E] staining and Fite-Faraco staining). The other six cases were diagnosed as other nonspecific dermatitis by histopathological findings. Eleven cases that were dermoscopically negative were also confirmed by histopathology to be truly negative. There are three inconclusive cases of dermoscopic findings, which were diagnosed as mid-borderline leprosy by histopathology. Dermoscopic and histopathological correlation was found above 87% in all types of leprosy except mid-borderline leprosy, which showed only a 25% correlation. Conclusion: Dermoscopy is a useful noninvasive tool to assess lesions of leprosy, requires less time for diagnosis, skin features are magnified several times and may become evident before clinical presentation. It definitely helps to reduce the number of biopsies in case of diagnosis of leprosy. However, in doubtful cases, histopathology is required for definitive diagnosis as it is the gold standard to date.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call