An investigation of the individualized, two-point calibration method for cuffless blood pressure estimation using pulse arrival time: an historical perspective using the Casio BP-100 digital watch.

Abstract

The use of wearable cuffless blood pressure (BP) devices is becoming commercially prevalent with little published validation information. Most devices rely, at least in part, on the relationship between pulse arrival time (PAT) and BP, a theoretical fundamental relationship that was first commercially exploited in 1993 with the release of the Casio BP-100 digital watch. This study explored the PAT method of BP estimation in a commercial device where it first began, the Casio BP-100 (Model No. 900) digital watch, which employs an individualized, two-point calibration method. Device accuracy was determined by comparison to a conventional cuff-based BP device measurements. Twenty participants (11 female, 9 male) had BP measured using both devices at rest, during a 5-minute isometric hand-grip exercise and at 1-minute post-exercise. Due to bidirectional scatter of BP estimation by the BP-100 device, there was no significant difference between the reference device and the BP-100. The devices showed poor correlation for both systolic BP (SBP) (R=0.36, p=0.13) and diastolic BP (DBP) (R=0.044, p=0.37). However, on average the watch was able to provide correct directional changes in SBP but not DBP with exercise. Despite being an industry first, the Casio BP-100 watch employed a method that gives a great chance of accuracy: a two point, individualized calibration method - more detailed than calibration methods in more modern devices. The watch, on average across a cohort, provided some information on BP directional change but was uncorrelated with cuff-based BP measurement. If the utility of beat-by-beat BP estimation is to be utilized, limitations of this method need to be addressed.