An Investigation of the Enigmas and Accessibility of Academic Literature, Writing, and Peer Review

Abstract

Novice researchers and postgraduate students have traditionally viewed the systematic method of writing as opaque, difficult, untidy, and tedious. This research investigated the enigmas and accessibility associated with academic literature, writing, and peer review. Secondary sources were used to collect data and conduct this investigation. The review paper aims to encompass various types of literature and writing, and although there is no universally accepted approach, different methodologies are necessary for different types of reviews and writings. The challenges associated with comprehending, evaluating, and composing literature mostly arise from the initial inability to accurately ascertain the reviewer's specific objectives and choose a systematic and thorough approach to pursue them. The process of reviewing and producing academic literature is a challenging endeavor that requires careful attention, well-defined goals, timely access to appropriate resources, and sufficient availability of relevant information. The study findings have significant implications for scholars and postgraduate students who are required to engage in literature evaluation and writing at different levels, particularly during crucial, specified, and constrained time periods.