Abstract

Recently, emphasis has been placed on finding a reliable estimation of soil water content. In this study, two capacitance sensors EC5 and 5TE (METER Group) were utilized. These sensors provide many benefits relative to other sensors in that they are cost-effective and very economical regarding energy use, operate at a high measurement frequency of 70 MHz, and are dedicated to measuring at a small volume because of their small size. This makes them suitable for the context of use in this research, which consists of multiple sustainable drainage systems SuDS. Several studies have evaluated these two types of sensor but not for urban soils with specific characteristics. In addition, results from the literature are divergent and the published calibration data are limited. Therefore, an in-depth investigation of their accuracy is assessed in this paper. At first, the literature’s existing procedures and methods were examined. The sensor-to-sensor variability, as well as repeatability, were tested in soil and solutions. Additionally, a field calibration method was conducted to estimate the effects of soil texture on sensors readings. Two laboratory calibration methods having different principles were also applied, compared to each other and to the field calibration as well. Results revealed weak sensor-to-sensor variability (coefficient of variation up to 15% in soil) and also good repeatability (0.1%), for both sensors. A soil-specific calibration equation has improved the estimation of the volumetric water content. In case of soil having high field bulk density, the undisturbed soil calibration method described and proposed in this paper gives promising results. The latter method yields a volumetric water content (VWC) prediction accuracy of 0.025 m3∙m−3 on a sandy loam soil. This paper presents a large knowledge of capacitance sensors measurement technique as well as their calibration procedures and methods. Limitations of existing procedures have been identified and key elements for selecting the appropriate one are suggested. Derived calibration equations have also been provided for three urban soils with different particle size distribution, ranging from sandy loam to silt loam. Accurate monitoring of soil moisture content in urban soils is thus achievable.

Highlights

  • Precise measurements of soil moisture content in vadose zones remain a major challenge for estimating water balances, characterizing chemical and biological processes and for developing

  • The objectives of the present paper are (i) to evaluate sensor-to-sensor variability and repeatability, (ii) to assess the accuracy of manufacturer calibration equation and the effect of soil texture on sensors output, for this purpose a field calibration was performed, (iii) to perform two different direct laboratory calibration methods and compare them with the field calibration, (iv) to compare manufacturer calibration with other direct/two-step calibration procedures reported in the literature, and (v) to evaluate the uncertainty of prediction of soil moisture measurement

  • Continuous monitoring of soil moisture in sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) is often necessary for hydrological performance evaluation, water balance estimation, soil hydrodynamic characteristics determination and calibration and validation of hydrological models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Precise measurements of soil moisture content in vadose zones remain a major challenge for estimating water balances, characterizing chemical and biological processes and for developingSensors 2020, 20, 6510; doi:10.3390/s20226510 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensorsSensors 2020, 20, 6510 hydrological models. Existing techniques are classified into two different categories: the first requires contact with the soil while the second does not. Both of these have advantages and limitations. Remote sensing [1,2,3], a contact-free technique, enables large scale measurement and can be used in isolated location [4]. It is highly affected by vegetation and surface roughness, and is limited to near-surface measures. To measure with high spatial and temporal resolutions at the point scale and in the soil profile, contact-based techniques are more appropriate

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call