Abstract
Numerous studies have been carried out to ascertain the mechanisms of low-salinity and smart water flooding technique for improved oil recovery. Focus was often on brine composition and, specifically, the cationic content in sandstone reservoirs. Given the importance of the salt composition and concentration, tweaking the active ions which are responsible for the fluids–rock equilibrium will bring into effect numerous mechanisms of displacement which have been extensively debated. This experimental study, however, was carried out to evaluate the extent of the roles of chloride- and sulphate-based brines in improved oil recovery. To carry this out, 70,000 ppm sulphates- and chloride-based brines were prepared to simulate formation water and 5000 ppm brines of the same species as low-salinity displacement fluids. Core flooding process was used to simulate the displacement of oil by using four (4) native sandstones core samples, obtained from Burgan oil field in Kuwait, at operating conditions of 1500 psig and 50 °C. The core samples were injected with 70,000 ppm chloride and sulphates and subsequently flooded with the 5000 ppm counterparts in a forced imbibition process. Separate evaluations of chloride- and sulphate-based brines were carried out to investigate the displacement efficiencies of each brine species. The results showed that in both high- and low-salinity displacement tests, the SO4 brine presented better recovery of up to 89% of the initial oil saturation (Soi). Several mechanisms of displacement were observed to be responsible for improved recovery during SO4 brine displacement. IFT measurement experiments also confirmed that there was reduction in IFT at test conditions between SO4 brine and oil and visual inspection of the effluent showed a degree emulsification of oil and brines. Changes in pH were observed in the low-salinity flooding, and negligible changes were noticed in the high-salinity floods. These results provide an insight into the roles of chloride and sulphate ions in the design of smart “designer” water and low-salinity injection scenarios.
Highlights
Water flooding is a secondary recovery method which has been in practice for decades as a means to increase the reservoir pressure and subsequently improve oil recovery without formation damage (Aminian and ZareNezhad1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2020) 10:2857–28712019)
The results obtained in this study revealed that a combination of sulphate-based brine improved oil recovery to a significant degree as seen in the ultimate recovery results from all the core samples
Distilled water experiments highlighted the significance of the presence of ions in the displacement brines given the poor microscopic and macroscopic sweeps depicted by the poor recovery efficiencies in all the flooded core plugs albeit the presence of kaolinite clays
Summary
Water flooding is a secondary recovery method which has been in practice for decades as a means to increase the reservoir pressure and subsequently improve oil recovery without formation damage (Aminian and ZareNezhad1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2020) 10:2857–28712019). Low-salinity water flooding (LSF) is an evolving technique of EOR, where the salinity of injected waters is controlled to improve oil recovery (Robertson 2007; Nasralla and Nasr-El-Din 2011; Bedrikovetsky and Zeinijahrami 2015; Kumar et al 2016). It is an enhanced oil recovery method that uses water with low concentration of the dissolved salts as a flooding medium (Sheng 2014). Low salinity of water flooding has widely practiced as an EOR technique and is relatively cheaper and environmentally friendly among other conventional recovery techniques (Suman et al 2014; Sheng 2014)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have