An interplay between cross-cultural and psychometric factors in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Experience from the language of a small nation

Abstract

The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that the total word length on the Memory subtest of the Czech version of the MoCA, which is 12 syllables compared to the English version of 7 syllables, would have a significant effect on Delayed Recall scores compared to the newly created well-balanced version of the test (further MoCA-WLE). In the original Czech version of MoCA, we replaced the 12-syllable word list in the Memory subtest with a 7-syllable list (MoCA-WLE) to make it equivalent to the standard English version in this respect. We analyzed data from 83 participants in the original MoCA group (70.63 ± 7.01 years old, 14.61 ± 3.17 years of education, 30.12% males) and 83 participants in the MoCA-WLE group (70.72 ± 6.95 years old, 14.93 ± 3.48 years of education, 30.12% males). We did not find evidence for a significant word-length effect in the original MoCA versus MoCA-WLE Delayed Recall in either the Mann–Whitney U test (W = 3418.0, p = .932) or multilevel binomial regression (b = 0.10, 95% posterior probability interval [−0.46, 0.68]). The present study shows cross-cultural limits in the adaptation of the test material. The results underline the caveats of such an approach to test adaptation. Fortunately, 12-syllables in the MoCA Memory Czech version versus the original 7-syllable list did not show a detectable word-length effect. We did not find evidence for differential item functioning or cultural item bias. The original MoCA Czech version is psychometrically comparable to the original English version.