An intercomparison of cloud‐resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data

Abstract

AbstractThis paper reports an intercomparison study of midlatitude continental cumulus convection simulated by eight two‐dimensional and two three‐dimensional cloud‐resolving models (CRMs), driven by observed large‐scale advective temperature and moisture tendencies, surface turbulent fluxes, and radiative‐heating profiles during three sub‐periods of the summer 1997 Intensive Observation Period of the US Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program. Each sub‐period includes two or three precipitation events of various intensities over a span of 4 or 5 days. The results can be summarized as follows.CRMs can reasonably simulate midlatitude continental summer convection observed at the ARM Cloud and Radiation Testbed site in terms of the intensity of convective activity, and the temperature and specific‐humidity evolution. Delayed occurrences of the initial precipitation events are a common feature for all three sub‐cases among the models. Cloud mass fluxes, condensate mixing ratios and hydrometeor fractions produced by all CRMs are similar. Some of the simulated cloud properties such as cloud liquid‐water path and hydrometeor fraction are rather similar to available observations. All CRMs produce large downdraught mass fluxes with magnitudes similar to those of updraughts, in contrast to CRM results for tropical convection. Some inter‐model differences in cloud properties are likely to be related to those in the parametrizations of microphysical processes.There is generally a good agreement between the CRMs and observations with CRMs being significantly better than single‐column models (SCMs), suggesting that current results are suitable for use in improving parametrizations in SCMs. However, improvements can still be made in the CRM simulations; these include the proper initialization of the CRMs and a more proper method of diagnosing cloud boundaries in model outputs for comparison with satellite and radar cloud observations. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society