Abstract

As the level of greenhouse gas emissions increases, so does the importance of the energy performance of buildings (EPB). One of the main factors to measure EPB is a structure’s heating load (HL) and cooling load (CL). HLs and CLs depend on several variables, such as relative compactness, surface area, wall area, roof area, overall height, orientation, glazing area, and glazing area distribution. This research uses deep neural networks (DNNs) to forecast HLs and CLs for a variety of structures. The DNNs explored in this research include multi-layer perceptron (MLP) networks, and each of the models in this research was developed through extensive testing with a myriad number of layers, process elements, and other data preprocessing techniques. As a result, a DNN is shown to be an improvement for modeling HLs and CLs compared to traditional artificial neural network (ANN) models. In order to extract knowledge from a trained model, a post-processing technique, called sensitivity analysis (SA), was applied to the model that performed the best with respect to the selected goodness-of-fit metric on an independent set of testing data. There are two forms of SA—local and global methods—but both have the same purpose in terms of determining the significance of independent variables within a model. Local SA assumes inputs are independent of each other, while global SA does not. To further the contribution of the research presented within this article, the results of a global SA, called state-based sensitivity analysis (SBSA), are compared to the results obtained from a traditional local technique, called sensitivity analysis about the mean (SAAM). The results of the research demonstrate an improvement over existing conclusions found in literature, which is of particular interest to decision-makers and designers of building structures.

Highlights

  • Energy waste is a growing concern, given its negative effects on the environment

  • The outputs of the artificial neural network (ANN) and deep neural networks (DNNs) models are summarized in Table 4 for the testing dataset and in Table 5 for the training dataset

  • Comparing the performance measures in experiments 5 and 9 indicated that, by applying randomization as a data preprocessing technique, root mean square error (RMSE) was improved by 44.37%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy waste is a growing concern, given its negative effects on the environment. As a result, decision-makers should pay close attention to energy efficiency. There are four significant tools mainly used to forecast EPB These tools include engineering calculations, simulation modeling, statistical modeling, and machine learning [7]. ANNs have attracted attention because of their capability to model non-linear relationships within data. ANNs including a significant number of hidden layers are referred to as deep neural networks (DNNs), and the process of training the model is called deep learning (DL). SAAM captures cause-and-effect relationships between dependent and independent variables The advantages of this method include easy implementation, simple interpretation, and application, along with quality statistical analysis [12,13]. This paper applies and compares ANN and DNN techniques to the available dataset in order to forecast the energy performance of residential buildings.

Literature Review
Evaluation Criteria
Description of the Dataset
Experimental Characteristics
Methodology
Performance
Comparison of ANN and DNN Performance
Learning curve
Prediction interval testing data
18. Similar
10. Network
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call