Abstract

Available space in congested cities is getting scarce due to growing urbanization in the recent past. The utilization of underground space is considered as a solution to the limited space in smart cities. The numbers of underground facilities are growing day by day in the developing world. Typical underground facilities include the transit subway, parking lots, electric lines, water supply and sewer lines. The likelihood of the occurrence of accidents due to underground facilities is a random phenomenon. To avoid any accidental loss, a risk assessment method is required to conduct the continuous risk assessment and report any abnormality before it happens. In this paper, we have proposed a hierarchical fuzzy inference based model for under-ground risk assessment. The proposed hierarchical fuzzy inference architecture reduces the total number of rules from the rule base. Rule reduction is important because the curse of dimensionality damages the transparency and interpretation as it is very tough to understand and justify hundreds or thousands of fuzzy rules. The computation time also increases as rules increase. The proposed model takes 175 rules having eight input parameters to compute the risk index, and the conventional fuzzy logic requires 390,625 rules, having the same number of input parameters to compute risk index. Hence, the proposed model significantly reduces the curse of dimensionality. Rule design for fuzzy logic is also a tedious task. In this paper, we have also introduced new rule schemes, namely maximum rule-based and average rule-based; both schemes can be used interchangeably according to the logic needed for rule design. The experimental results show that the proposed method is a virtuous choice for risk index calculation where the numbers of variables are greater.

Highlights

  • Underground space and structures are hard to monitor because access to most of the underground facilities is difficult or almost impossible

  • We have introduced new rule schemes, namely maximum rule-based and average rule-based; both schemes can be used interchangeably according to the logic needed for rule design

  • The proposed approach tackles the issues faced by conventional fuzzy logic risk assessment frameworks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Underground space and structures are hard to monitor because access to most of the underground facilities is difficult or almost impossible. Many issues are associated with underground facilities, such as leakage, liquefaction, collapse, distortion, and floods. Underground risk has to be evaluated periodically so that high-risk areas can be sustained in a timely fashion in order to make certain the protection of the people [1]. Different ways exist for assessing underground risks, such as assertion, sustainability, safety, and the environment; these are portrayed by risk ratings, such as high, low, or medium. The risk score is based on different criteria, it can be aggregated in order to find overall risk. Using overall risk the maintenance priority can be determined. Underground risk assessment needs a large number of subjective judgments from the experts; these types of assessments are costly and time-consuming

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call